April 15, 2012

Michigan State Championship Event (Week 7)

During the opening ceremony of the Michigan State Championship, the MC talked about the history of the Michigan State Championship. The district system started the same year when we were a rookie so this is the fourth time there was a Michigan State Championship. He gave some statistics about the 64 teams that were there how many times they have been at the Michigan State Championship. We were pleasantly surprised that we were one of a small group of teams that made it in all four years.

After the Niles District Competition, we knew we had to improve our robot to be competitive. Our robot never balanced a single time successfully at Niles. That may be good enough at a district event but not at the State Championship. We spent a lot of time designing and building an arm that would rotate down to lower the bridge and rotate down further to help balance the robot on the bridge. Unfortunately, we just barely finished putting it on the practice robot and we were only able to test it once lowering the bridge. We didn't have enough time to test it more because we had to take it out to transfer it to the competition robot once we got to the State Championship event.

We had issues with the chain skipping on the sprocket and we were finally able to fix it Friday afternoon. Unfortunately due to the circumstances, we were not able to demonstrate to the other teams what we can do. We had two more matches on Saturday to show our robot’s ability. The first one was the first match of Saturday right after the opening ceremony when almost everyone there would be watching. In the hybrid mode we shot the two balls in, and as soon as the teleop mode started, we drove to the side of the alliance bridge to lower it to let the two balls roll down. Unfortunately the student who was operating the arm got overly excited and moved the arm down too fast, pushing the bridge down quickly, and continued to push. The arm has so much power that it actually flipped us backwards. I knew at the time that no team would pick us for the elimination round because of this, and unfortunately I was right.

We also did not win a single team award. The only bright moment this weekend was when one of our co-team captains, Ryan Hoyt, winning one of the 6 spots for the Dean’s List Finalist from Michigan. Now he will be competing in St. Louis for the 10 Dean’s List winner spots.

Fortunately for us, we already pre-registered to go to St. Louis so we have another chance to show what our robot can actually do.

March 25, 2012

Niles District Event (Week 4)

This was our first time going to Niles Michigan for a competition. We had heard from others that the gym was small, but we were pleasantly surprised to find that there were plenty of seats. We only made minor changes to the robot since the robot performed well at Waterford. Once again, we set a goal to reach the finals and win two awards.
We did very well in the qualifying round, winning 9 of 12 matches. We ended up seeding 7th and we were picked 5th overall by Team 27. We then selected Team 3572. We had a great alliance in the elimination round. Team 27 is a great scorer in teleop and they can get the two balls on the coopertition bridge during autonomous. Team 3572 is very good at scoring the two balls in the hybrid mode. We won the quarterfinals and then beat the number 1 alliance in the semifinals. In the finals, Team 27’s robot hit the wall really hard and broke down. We had no chance with the excellent defense that our opposing alliance was doing. We lost both matches quickly.
We reached our goal to get to the finals and we also won two awards: Website award and Entrepreneurship award. The team did a great job at Niles.

March 11, 2012

Waterford District Event (Week 2)

This is the first year we did not participate in a Week 1 competition event. In the first few years as a new team, it was better for us to play in a week 1 event since it is more of a level playing field when nobody has played the game yet and no one knows what to expect. However, last year we tried to design an all-around robot and ran out of time to fully test the robot which resulted in our robot not working properly at our week 1 competition. Based on that experience, we decided against week 1 events. It was a good decision because we ran out of time again this year so the extra week was very useful.
We arrived at Waterford High School with high expectations. During the build season, we put equal emphasis on the building of the robot and the preparation work for winning the awards. Our goal was to get to the finals and win two awards.
Competition was fierce. Our robot worked better than we expected even though we had very limited time to calibrate the shooter. Our programmer did a fantastic job putting in a lot of last minute changes. It was nice to finally see the fruits of our labor when the bridge lowering device worked and we could shoot two balls into the basket during hybrid mode.
The semifinals match was very close. We tied after the first two matches. In the third match, we were ahead by 8 points but were accidentally flipped by our alliance partner when we tried to balance on the bridge with them. We ended up losing by two points.
However we were pleasantly surprised to win 3 awards at the event. We won the Best Website award, Engineering Inspiration award, and Imagery award. I was most proud of our team winning the Imagery award. In our rookie year, our robot got laughed at because it was built with the cheapest material we could find. The students felt bad when they saw other team’s robot with nice paint and expensive polycarbonate sheets. In the last two years, our robot looked progressively better but we focused more on function than the look. This year, discussion on robot appearance started right in the beginning. We decided to follow the same theme as our pit, website and newsletter. The robot looks very nice and it is easy to identify that it is our team.

February 19, 2012

2012 Build Season Week 6

We made a lot of progress this week, but we also had some setbacks. First, the good news is that award submissions were done on time without any issues. Also, the robot is finally moving and we are able to control the shooting speed well using P control alone. The bumpers are also done. The bad news is that the robot is too bouncy with the pneumatics wheels, the hood on the shooter is too high when rotated up all the way, the bridge lowering device is not strong enough to push the bridge down, and the robot is about 8 pounds over the weight limit. Fortunately, we have solutions for every issue and we are confident that everything will work. We are on schedule to bag the robot and bumpers. We will use our 30 pounds withholding limit and the access period to finish the last minutes changes. This year we are going to Week Two and Week Four district events so we have a little more time.